|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1411
|
Posted - 2015.04.10 21:26:42 -
[1] - Quote
There are no shortage to garmur counters.
Sentinel, reduces margin for error to minimal levels. Cruor, reduces margin for error. Hyena, reduces margin for error. Dramiel, faster, tankier and more dps. Though weak vs defensive scram. Multiple sniper corms or area denial coercers. Element of surprise with an OH, dual overdrive derptron gets a lot of people garmur kills.
The one property that a boosted rep fleet point garmur has in common with all of these is its 2-200x more expensive.
There is no denying that kiting was a lot more challenging for me when i flew the maulus more, its incorrect to say there is no paper for the garmurs stone. Shiny killmails in space waiting to happen is a good thing. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1411
|
Posted - 2015.04.10 22:21:44 -
[2] - Quote
Christine Peeveepeeski wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:There are no shortage to garmur counters.
Sentinel, reduces margin for error to minimal levels. Cruor, reduces margin for error. Hyena, reduces margin for error. Dramiel, faster, tankier and more dps. Though weak vs defensive scram. Multiple sniper corms or area denial coercers. Element of surprise with an OH, dual overdrive derptron gets a lot of people garmur kills.
The one property that a boosted rep fleet point garmur has in common with all of these is its 2-200x more expensive.
There is no denying that kiting was a lot more challenging for me when i flew the maulus more, its incorrect to say there is no paper for the garmurs stone. Shiny killmails in space waiting to happen is a good thing. Thanks for the input Crosi, while I'd say you have listed some fantastic counters to all kiters certainly in plexes I'd also say that perhaps I have not made my point clearly. Why would I fly any of them when I could fly a garmur? In a garmur I can now engage a massive range of ships, or just leave. The ships you just listed are much more limited. I also don't want this to degenerate into solely an anti garmur post. I am very specifically gathering it, the orthrus and the t3 dessies into one pile. It's just too easy to get kills and run from people you don't like.
I guess your choice of ships would depend on if there is a garmur doing something that offends you and if you want to kill it. If not fly a garmur. if there is a ship you cant break with a garmur, go get a counter to whatever that as per established rock paper scissors rules
Though yes, the engagement/disengagement envelope of garmur can be wide depending on fit and setup, While there are counters that are much cheaper i would hesitate to say its broken. That said, i do just let some people go in structure, i feel that bad for them. But then im flying with many billions of isk invested and they are flying with 10-50m isk There absolutely should be depreciating returns, but 7bil is a lot more than 50m :p |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1411
|
Posted - 2015.04.11 19:49:46 -
[3] - Quote
Dato Koppla wrote:IIRC Crosi, you fly your Garmurs linked and HG snaked, those things have no counters assuming an equal level of pilot skill. The stuff you listed has a chance of killing Garmurs IF they mess up, and that's not really an argument since X can always kill Y if Y messes bad enough up regardless of the ship.
8km/s cold Garmurs are basically immune to almost everything that can hit it. I remember trying to kill a Garmur in an LML Talwar only to find my missiles would peter out before they hit the Garmur and even then, if I did manage to hit him he could just pull range and warp out since he'd be fighting at 60km where nothing bar another Garmur/Orthrus could point him. Drones don't hit, rail corms you can just pull range and leave, faster MWD ships don't have a hope of catching you with 20km defensive scram, sentinel only neuts to 30km and is far slower, Hyena only webs to 40 and even if you get webbed, you can just warp out before he gets the point on etc etc
Garmurs are broken mostly because of how powerful offgrid links are but even then, the ship design allows you to scale ridiculously well with links that it's just stupid.
The fact that garmur has a lot of GTFO isnt a problem. It shares this with a lot of ships. Fact is any kite ship has plenty of GTFO if its user is paying attention. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1411
|
Posted - 2015.04.12 02:21:17 -
[4] - Quote
Liam Inkuras wrote:Crosi is the Garmur pilot of my heart
Glad to see you have calmed down. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.25 17:56:31 -
[5] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:crosi is... well lets just say his skin is very pale and one of his arms is bigger than the other...
Wrong thread, i think you were looking for the 'projecting our insecurities on others' thread
No doubt the garmur has a very effective set of bonuses. As ive said though, the game isnt balanced around isk and all the counters to the garmurs bonuses happen to be a lot cheaper, with the exception of a properly supported dram perhaps. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 03:23:44 -
[6] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:wilgotna wrote:crosi is... well lets just say his skin is very pale and one of his arms is bigger than the other...
Wrong thread, i think you were looking for the 'projecting our insecurities on others' thread No doubt the garmur has a very effective set of bonuses. As ive said though, the game isnt balanced around isk and all the counters to the garmurs bonuses happen to be a lot cheaper, with the exception of a properly supported dram perhaps. nah the garmur is just poorly designed. ways to maybe fix it: 1. get rid of 1 mid 2. nerf its cap so it cant perma run all its mids PS crosi try alternating your crank arm so you dont look so silly
I dont even understand that insult, are you...ok? You are very bitter for someone who i barely remember and whos beef seems to be my choice of pixels in a computer game or perhaps some comlex derived from it lol. In this you are not alone so dont feel too bad :}
As for those tweaks, nah, garmur is fine the way it is. There are more ways to kill a garmur than some other frigs out there. Peoples biggest valid complaint is that it runs away at the first sign of a counter. That attribute is not ship related or limited to the garmur |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 04:01:45 -
[7] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:crosi every time you respond to me its either a pathetic straw man, or you say im mad. just quiet down
WOW lol, I have been perfectly civil and havent insulted you once, but you are clearly mad. I let your insults, strawmen and projection slide because i assume there is an out of game reason you are so hostile to people who play certain ways in a space submawrine game. However, Im not really interested in your oog issues.
CCP recognised the problem wth the rifter in its class was the other t1 frigates being almost completely useless and fixed them. The rifters shift from best to not that good, outside some changes to projectiles, was not achieved through changes to the hull. As such, this exam[ple doesnt support you argument very well at all. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 04:46:25 -
[8] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:crosi talking to you always feels like talking to a child
heres the difference between my post and your post
me:
crosi is a nerd (hilarious comment completely unrelated to the bulk of my post meant solely for my own amusement)
criticism of garmur which is related to the thread (this is the main point of my post)
crosi:
wow you are mad lol so hostile (this is you completely missing the point of my post while simultaneously trying to sound like an intellectual but in reality you just come off as stupid)
as for my rifter example, once again you completely miss the point
i made a hypothetical situation to analogize the creation of the garmur/t3 dessies to the HYPOTHETICAL creation of a super-rifter
this has NOTHING to do with how the rifter was eventually "balanced"
edit: however if you'd like we can compare and contrast the ways in which these two situations were handled
rifter is overpowered: buff all the other ships in its class (ok sounds good)
kiting ship supremacy: lets create even stronger kiting ships (funny because its so ********)
Its more like;
You 'haha, you mastubate and i dont. And eve is really upsetting me becase some ships are better at some things than others'
Me 'you seem to be very focussed on my mastubatorial habits, i wonder why? And some ships are supposed to be better at some things than others.
Rifter is a much better brawler than my garmur for example, should we nerf the rifter of buff my garmur? I personally think that players should use skill to get into the stuations that their ship is suited for.
As for kiting being supreme, ask any decent dram pilot what they think of that notion. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 05:14:01 -
[9] - Quote
atron can easily counter kite condor, same with the comet and kite hb. Both atron and comet are faster than their counterparts. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 05:29:15 -
[10] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:ive killed countless garmurs by being the initial point/scram with a ceptor, which then was followed with a blob
doesnt mean the ship is balanced
if you even bothered to read any of the posts you respond to you would see that my contention is not that garmurs are invincible; my contention is that garmurs (and orthrus and t3 dessies for that matter) are conceptually flawed. anti-fun. blob-encouraging. damaging to the solo/smallgang meta.
they shouldnt exist. they take a problem (the kiting supremacy) and exacerbate it.
I have read your posts. As i have said, they boil down to 'haha. You mastubate. I dont. And eve is not fair because there is more than one type of ship'.
More shiny ships in space is a good thing. |
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 09:28:42 -
[11] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote: All else being equal, nothing, bar cruisers and up, will solo a linked garmur.
lolno |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 18:59:31 -
[12] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Yuri Antollare wrote: All else being equal, nothing, bar cruisers and up, will solo a linked garmur.
lolno This is a little stifled with no example.
Which is better than just being wrong. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 07:28:53 -
[13] - Quote
Dread Operative wrote:wilgotna wrote: a loki boosting you at all times He doesn't use a Loki all the time, sometimes it's a Proteus. Jeez get your facts straight.
I actually never use a loki.
And well done wil, you managed to get super angry at someones opinion WITHOUT commenting on their masturbatorial habits. I think we have turned a corner! |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 17:46:36 -
[14] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:wilgotna wrote:
No the garmur is op precisely because a super nerd like crosi can use a 3 bil pod and an off grid booster
Eve has an incredibly low skillcap. Any mongo can use a snaked/linked garmur and hit orbit.
Even his garmur fits just screams scared nerd.
I hate linked garmurs... linked anything as much as the next guy. But you sound like crosi is your secret crush and its an unrequited love.
He makes a valid point, because of edge cases like the amount of isk a handful of people put into pvp, the entire game should be rebalanced.
The only thing i can recall about wilgotna is he was just as bitter at me when i flew only maulus for a year lol.
Lots of people, in and out of game, lack the introspection to apply the same standards to people they dislike (for whatever reason) as they do to those they like, or particularly themselves. We have an acute case here. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 18:54:10 -
[15] - Quote
Dread Operative wrote:Quote:.... because of edge cases like the amount of isk a handful of people put into pvp, the entire game should be rebalanced.
Lots of people, in and out of game, lack the introspection to apply the same standards to people they dislike (for whatever reason) as they do to those they like, or particularly themselves. We have an acute case here. So much win in this statment, if people are willing to risk the isk and have the SP, who are we to bad mouth them? Heaven forbid a whole Corp does it though, cause then it's easy mode..... Complimant and tongue in cheek in the same post. I like.
Challenge can only be measured against the task. When you have an 80 man t3/guard fleet all with lg/hg slaves, with caps and supers on standby to fight 40 t1 bs and another 40 cruisers who only fly together on that scale once or less per week (and 1/3 are fail-fit), that really is a good shot at easy mode. Specially when you guys only undock when you have eyes on the target.
Im not complaining, im just saying its easy mode. Ive been there.
If you wanted to draw any parallel from what im talking about, i fight any number of people. It would be like snufds 80 man fleet fighting anywhere from 160 to 1000s of people since i often look for kills while massively outnumbered in the garmur. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1413
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 20:23:36 -
[16] - Quote
Dread Operative wrote:Math is hard.
No doubt in your tz they are a bit weaker, snufd actually push suj local to 100 in theirs. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 08:53:44 -
[17] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:Lug Muad'Dib wrote:Pilot like Crosi are OP, not the Garmur. If you need a blob to kill a garmur..  two fast 3m isk atron can kill a garmur with def scram, try this versus a worm.. Garmur has lot of counter and great gtfo capacity, more with snake and links, like many other ships.. Those two derptrons have about 4k ehp each, one if not both will be dead by the time they get close enough to think they had a chance. Lest we mention the defensive scram for the survivor. You are correct though, Crosi is one of the best pilots around, I'm not a fan of links but at least he uses them 'right,' taking on odds where any other setup would die. This doesn't have to be so personal. Individuals aside, the Garmur has probably the least number of counters out there. Most other frigates with boosts, Incursus/other brawlers, or LML frigate/slicer, still have plenty of hard counters out there, even if the opponent doesn't have his own boosts. Cookie Cutter Slasher fits will trash a linked brawler, and even with boosts the traditional kiting ships out there have their weaknesses from weapons range to overall speed. I could slap a RF long point and boosts on a Slicer, but I'd have to lose my pulse lasers, I could do the same to a condor but I'm still limited to my missile range (42km), which is putting you at least within the margin of error of being ****** with by someone competent. With the Garmur, you could fit a specific hard counter, with the same boosts/implants, and still only have a 1/2 chance of making it out alive let alone killing the Garmur. The entire t1 frigate line is no good, all are significantly slower and lack the EHP to survive chasing down a Garmur and getting scram, the defensive scram again, a serious final hurdle. Other faction/pirate frigates and EAFs, I'd give it a shot in a structure tanked blaster Comet. I'm still slower by 2k m/s and again if the Garmur has a defensive scram, chances are not great. Now a Dram gets close, still slower all else being equal and again, the defensive scram is rough. You could fit an overdrive and drop a gyrostab, leaving you with the same dps as a Garmur, but with the Garmur having 70km of lead time to shoot you in the face, your small AAR only runs 40 seconds without a cap booster as well. You could medium shield extend it but you only get 2.8k more ehp than the Garmur just running a DCU, bout 25 seconds worth of Garmur shooting you in the face. Again, presuming the Garmur is running away that 25 seconds won't cover the time it takes you to catch him, which is never because again, you're still slower. Apparently Hyena and Sentinel were bandied about but I'm going to assume those were troll suggestions. A hyena could web out to 68km, might take him a while to kill you with his 25 dps though. Sentinel, 30km neuts versus a ship almost twice as quick as you orbiting at 60km... Just seems too dominant to me, bonuses in point/weapon range and inherent strong stats that scale amazingly well with boosts, OP is built into the ships DNA. Hands down best in class by a massive margin.
Problem with this analysis, is you take all the attributes possible for a garmur and assume every garmur has them all. A tank, long lock range, extreme damage projection, extreme speed, good dps, expensive mods, long and short point etc. While the garmur is extremely good its nessasary to pick which attributes you get since you cant have them all.
In the end i dont disagree that the garmur has few counters on a 1v1 level when you scale up the isk and support. Though boosted, snaked dual tackle garmurs are quite rare in my experience. Have killed a couple wth 2/3 derptrons tho, boosts wouldnt have mattered since the derp can do 10kms OH if you are, and element of shock is worth more than 1000 defensive scrams.
I also dont disagree with the idea of removing a mod slot to force people to chose their engagement envelope but when he suggested it wil had already mentioned my man meat twice so i thought he was more interested in that.
Speaking of which, unfortunate relapse there wil :( dont give up man. You will be a lot happier when you start giving your own genitals at least as much attention as everyone mine. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 20:19:27 -
[18] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:crosi's garmur is easy to beat because he's a coward who runs double sebo
the instant you land on grid with a fast ship he's gonna warp or die because his fit is purely for KM whoring so he can have a nice killboard while being a rubbish pilot
thats also why you should take crosi's argument that the garmur can be killed by an atron or a dramiel with a grain of salt. because he doesnt fit the thing that makes the garmur truly op: the long range defensive scram
Wouldnt running a defensive scram be more cowardly? Dual sebo is an offensive set up for acquiring tackle at 12kms and increasing chances of tackling pods. And you are correct i do wh0re on all my solo* kills.
*not to be mistaken for trusoloTM |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 22:31:38 -
[19] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:Gully Alex Foyle wrote:7.500 dead Garmurs for your enjoyment: https://zkillboard.com/ship/33816/losses/
15 killed solo just on the first page. The Garmur's stats may be a tad excessive, but smart EVE players always find a way to kill stuff (and/or dumb players find ways to lose stuff). I agree with Crosi that more shiny ships is ok for the game. Creates content in many different ways, including, of course, popcorn threads like this one. If 'honorable 1v1s' are your cup of tea, just fly standard frigs without links and engage standard frigs that you presume do not have links. Leave the linky op-ish stuff to those who enjoy flying - and hunting - them. That doesn't really help the argument that they are not OP, as 111,134 ships have been destroyed by Garmurs. Do the math and you find that 7500 is a rather low loss rate compared to the damage it has done. Not saying I'm against the Garmur, but those stats are not a good comparison to show the ship is not OP. The ship is expensive, and to be flown properly it has to have an expensive fit plus expensive implants. Yet, it can be killed by ships in large groups that are very inexpensive.
You are misreading the statistics, its the nature of how killboards work. Its very much like my killboard says ive killed 13k and only lost 700, in and of itself, that isnt a useful number or illustrative of my combat record. it might be an indication that i always fly in a blob or that i only kill ibis in rookie systems.
For example, the garmur has a 93% k/d efficiency and an 84% isk efficiency. If we compare that to something in its class the dramiel has a 90% k/d efficiency and a 90% isk efficiency. Not so far apart.
The problem with these numbers is they are almost meaningless and apply in NO WAY to any discussion of balance. since it doesnt adjust for number of people on killmails and a few other things. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.04.30 02:27:11 -
[20] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:crosi all your so-called "solo" kills are snaked/linked in the most op frigate in the game against caldari militia pilots who we both know cannot even tie their own shoes much less pvp
the fact that a frigate can put 200dps out to a 60k point while doing 12kms kinda sounds like an april fools joke. but no. its real.
I already disclaimed the word 'solo', as for 200 dps at 12kms, are you high? Dont answer that, your prescribed medication is your business. |
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 02:00:16 -
[21] - Quote
Fourteen Maken wrote:I think the point range bonus shouldn't apply to scrams, and the speed and agility needs nerfed a bit so we have more hard counters. That's all, nothing too crazy because all pirate frigs are good. The worm probably needs the drone dps reduced a bit but again nothing too crazy. Please don't break them before I get to fly one with proper skills.
Nerfing things hard doesnt mean you have more hard counters, it means you have less things to fight. Just wanted to say that. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 02:15:42 -
[22] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:crosi's spew should be disregarded because the only thing hes concerned with is his own entertainment. everything he says is self serving.
nerfing the scram bonus isnt that great of a nerf imo
base speed needs to be reduced. and capacitor needs to be nuked, or a mid needs to be nuked
also we need to dicuss the t3 dessies.
as i already said they are pretty much a joke as the 10mn coercer and 10mn thrasher were already incredibly strong. the t3 dessies are just even stronger versions of them.
Ill only fly some other ship then you will have to rage about how that needs nerfing lol.
Benefits of a perfect cross-trail :) |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 02:27:49 -
[23] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:crosi is so full of himself he actually thinks all discussions about ship balance are because of him
crosi you are bad
you are not even in gal mils top 20 solo killers
yet you raged about how lame the maulus was when i flew it ;)
AFAIK, im 27th of all pilots of all time on BC, which is not as good as some gal mil pilots that have been afk for over a year. Im actually really bad at eve, no doubt. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 02:32:17 -
[24] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:i did no such thing
in fact i was a far better maulus pilot than you
I have no idea about that, but while you were calling me lame for only flying a maulus you were using my maulus fit :) |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 02:47:05 -
[25] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:i may have used the same fit as you. but your fit was in no way amazing or requiring outside-the-box thinking
fitting ships in eve is not difficult
pretty much the only case where a fit really impressed me was quake's thrasher. and yes i shamelessly copied it
and yes it is lame to only fly the same risk-averse ship over and over and over and nothing else
You are welcome, one day people will copy and thank you too. Its no big deal. No thanks necessary!
Pretty sure quake was not the author of the 10mn arty thrasher, but you dont seem in the mood for an education lol.
He was just cool because he used 10mn arty thrasher for a year and a half and i was lame because i use a maulus for a year and a half. Your consistency is your best feature :) |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 03:14:48 -
[26] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:there are a few key differences between you and quake
1. he used the thrasher to fight 1v2 1v3 etc :versus: you are a puss
2. he is a skilled pilot :versus: you use snaked/linked kiting ships, hit orbit and then go afk
3. brawling with a thrasher :versus: you are a snaked/linked kiting puss
4. he fights other good pvpers :versus: you warp the instant you see anyone scary
5. anyone who is interested in eve pvp knows quake :versus: nobody knows or cares about you except to use you as an example of a puss like i do
You seem to care about me, quite a lot.
i didnt design the game, perhaps you should direct your hate towards ccp and see how that works out for you lol. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 03:25:31 -
[27] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:every single one of my game design criticisms is directed at ccp.
please dont confuse this with my criticisms of you as a pilot, which are directed at you
You might want to try harder, because as it is, it seems you are just obsessed with me. Ive never said im a good solo pilot or better than anyone. However i do get a lot of insecure players thinking that i do say these things. Ill leave it there. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1414
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 03:33:07 -
[28] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:keep putting words in my mouth you sad little man
im not going to just let you spew your filth without responding, if that gives the illusion that im obsessed with you then thats just the way it has to be. by that logic you are equally obsessed with me.
You dont have to prove my point, but if you insist. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1416
|
Posted - 2015.05.02 23:43:37 -
[29] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:wilgotna wrote:crosi's spew should be disregarded because the only thing hes concerned with is his own entertainment. everything he says is self serving.
nerfing the scram bonus isnt that great of a nerf imo
base speed needs to be reduced. and capacitor needs to be nuked, or a mid needs to be nuked
also we need to dicuss the t3 dessies.
as i already said they are pretty much a joke as the 10mn coercer and 10mn thrasher were already incredibly strong. the t3 dessies are just even stronger versions of them. Have you actually tried fitting a 10mn AB to a t3d in Mosaic? To do so you really have to gimp your fit.
Why would he acknowledge changes to the ships he supposedly has a problem with, when in reality its just an insecurity driven personal vendetta lol. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1416
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 14:50:11 -
[30] - Quote
I think the point is that solo should be hard, why else would anyone have any respect for it otherwise?
Soloers asking CCP to balance the game towards their play style so as to make it easier for them is kinda missing the point entirely. |
|
|
|
|